Republican Talk

Republican news, politics, commentary

You are here

Ron Paul: Against Women's Rights

Replies

Robert Lewis's picture
Submitted by Robert Lewis on

I am pro-choice, but when it comes to the race for president I agree with Ron Paul an pretty much everything else. Luckily Ron Paul feels that the decision of whether to mandate abortion legal or illegal should be left up to the state. It isn'ta call that the federal government should make. This makes your point on whether or not Ron Paul is a good candidate for people to want for president null and void.

I would much rather vote for a candidate who came to the conclusion that life starts at conception through an occupational means than by a religious means even if I don't agree with the conclusion. The pros vastly outweigh the cons, and you should probably do a little more research into the other issues at stake. Just because his view is different than yours on abortion is no reason to discount a great candidate especially if he isn't going to try to enforce it. You need to take that up with your local government.

Liberty Anon's picture
Submitted by Liberty Anon on

If I were a "thinking people" I would believe that my vote for President would encompass a wide array of different issues, not based off of only one social issue that the President would have little to no impact on in the first place.

Paul will never use the power of the federal government to restrict the liberties of any US citizen, including a womans right to choose. He feels this is a state issue and a state issue alone, and based off of the vote in a very pro-life leaning state today in Mississippi voting against anti-abortion "personhood" amendment shows that the states will vote accordingly.

Paul is worthy of respect and admiration. His character is flawless and his word is chisled in stone. What a concept, to be an honest politician.

You should really look at his real world issues like foreign policy and monetary policy, these are the most important issues of the day, these are the issues where he stands alone and his answers are spot on.

Have a good day.

Liberty Anon's picture
Submitted by Liberty Anon on

If I were a "thinking people" I would believe that my vote for President would encompass a wide array of different issues, not based off of only one social issue that the President would have little to no impact on in the first place.

Paul will never use the power of the federal government to restrict the liberties of any US citizen, including a womans right to choose. He feels this is a state issue and a state issue alone, and based off of the vote in a very pro-life leaning state today in Mississippi voting against anti-abortion "personhood" amendment shows that the states will vote accordingly.

Paul is worthy of respect and admiration. His character is flawless and his word is chisled in stone. What a concept, to be an honest politician.

You should really look at his real world issues like foreign policy and monetary policy, these are the most important issues of the day, these are the issues where he stands alone and his answers are spot on.

Have a good day.

becksta*'s picture
Submitted by becksta* on

The thinking people that I refer to are people who respect women and who respect the separation of church and state. Ron Paul's views on women's rights could severely restrict women in many of the conservative states in the United States. Even though I live in a more liberal state, I cannot in good conscience support a candidate who is not in favor of women's rights.

Leave a Reply

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <ul> <ol> <li> <i> <b> <img> <table> <tr> <td> <th> <div> <strong> <p> <br> <u>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.